What this is

An independent, transparent LLM benchmark with one job: for each step of an LLM-backed pipeline, show the cheapest model that’s actually good enough — not the best model by default.

It runs on a premise most leaderboards ignore: production tasks have a quality threshold, not a maximum. Once a model clears the bar, extra capability is headroom you pay for and never use. So instead of ranking models head-to-head in aggregate, we score them per capability and rank the qualifiers by cost.

Every score here is derived from real production workloads — the financial-analysis pipeline run by KAPUALabs LLC through DTP. Not synthetic test sets, not customer data, not self-reported model numbers.

How it works (the short version)

  • Each task’s input goes to every candidate model in parallel.
  • A panel of LLM judges grades every output; scores are normalized per-judge, so a strict judge doesn’t sink the models it rates.
  • A score is only published once enough judges agree to trust it (confidence-gated). Anything we’re unsure about stays hidden.
  • Among models that clear your quality bar, rows sort by cost ascending.
  • The default “good enough” threshold is recomputed weekly from where the savings actually are.

Full mechanics — quality score, confidence bands, the slider, the cost math — live on the methodology page.

Reproducibility

  • The system and user prompt templates for every capability are published on its task page (the “Prompt templates” section).
  • Evaluation rubrics are listed on each task page.
  • One curated example input/output pair per capability.
  • Snapshots are immutable; the JSON payload that drives the site is committed to git on every publish.

Prompt + rubric + model + typical input shape is everything you need to reproduce a given score.

Cadence

Weekly snapshots, Monday mornings — plus ad-hoc snapshots when a new best-in-class model lands. The public site shows the most recent five in the changelog; full history lives in our backend. A writeup of each snapshot goes out in the journalsubscribe by email.

Who runs it

KAPUALabs LLC, alongside nova.kapualabs.com, where the source workloads originate. Questions, corrections, disagreements: bench@kapualabs.com.

Independent benchmarking. Results are derived from KAPUALabs LLC’s own production workloads, not from customer data. Each model links to its provider’s terms of service.