The Right-Sized LLM Benchmark Cheapest LLM that's good enough.

MiniMax M3 at a glance

Good enough on 20/52 tasks at the 90% bar. Best value on 8 tasks. Best fit for: Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Long-form Content Generation.

Provider
OpenRouter
Model name
minimax/minimax-m3
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
20 / 52 tasks (at 90% bar)
Best value on
8 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%78910Quality score (7–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Short Post Batch Relevance Scoring — quality 7.29, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Profiled Document Structure Extraction — quality 8.94, 2.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMarkdown Newline Repair — quality 8.76, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Research Query Validation — quality 8.61, 1.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 8.87, 1.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVisual Theme Configuration Generation — quality 8.47, 1.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Policy Evaluation — quality 8.47, 1.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.65, 3.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.94, 4.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.40, 3.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVoice Profile Generation — quality 9.58, 2.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.31, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Newsletter Copy Generation — quality 9.08, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Batch Text Translation — quality 8.81, 4.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSubject Configuration Generation — quality 8.59, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Profiled Document Section Analysis — quality 8.87, 4.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Content Promotion Generation — quality 7.78, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Structured Content Summarization — quality 8.39, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Structured Output Extraction — quality 9.36, 3.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.21, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the 90% bar are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Community Content Promotion Generation ★Social & Promotional Content90%RANKEDbest value
Subject Configuration Generation ★Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions97%RANKEDbest value
Short Post Batch Relevance Scoring ★Relevance, Classification & Matching96%RANKEDbest value
Profiled Document Analysis ★Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions95%MEDIUMbest value
Newsletter Copy Generation ★Long-form Content Generation97%RANKEDbest value
Structured Content Summarization ★Content Summarization & Synthesis91%RANKEDbest value
Topic Cluster Labeling ★Topic Organization & Clustering92%RANKEDbest value
Markdown Newline Repair ★Infrastructure & Utility94%MEDIUMbest value
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis97%RANKED1.2x
Visual Theme Configuration GenerationLong-form Content Generation90%RANKED1.7x
Community Policy EvaluationRelevance, Classification & Matching91%HIGH1.8x
Research Query ValidationInfrastructure & Utility98%RANKED1.9x
Voice Profile GenerationLong-form Content Generation97%RANKED2.2x
Profiled Document Structure ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction94%RANKED2.7x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching98%RANKED3.3x
Structured Output ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction96%RANKED3.5x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching96%RANKED3.9x
Profiled Document Section AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions97%RANKED4.2x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching99%RANKED4.5x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility94%HIGH4.5x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that clears the quality bar on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.