Cost mode:

Category: Long-form Content Generation · Rail: absolute · Typical I/O: 1018→2883 tokens

Models

Frontier on this task: Moonshot Kimi K3 at 9.33 / 10. Quality bar at 90%: 8.40.

point-estimate floor (CI low) · upper CI (less certain) · Bars sorted by blended cost; best-value model first. Greyed rows are MEDIUM+ models whose point estimate clears the bar but whose CI low does not.

ModelQuality scoreCI lowCost / 1k runsvs best value
Thinking Machines Inkling8.97 / 108.85$8.97best value
Moonshot Kimi K39.33 / 109.27$34.773.9x more expensive
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite8.11 / 107.91$0.6393% cheaper

Cost breakdown

ModelQualityConfidenceCost / 1k runsOverpayMode
Thinking Machines Inkling OpenRouter8.97 / 10 CI [8.85, 9.08]RANKED$8.97best valuebatch
Moonshot Kimi K3 best Moonshot AI9.33 / 10 CI [9.27, 9.39]RANKED$34.773.9xbatch

Overpay shows how much more you pay than the best-value model that clears the quality bar (marked ★) — the best-value good-enough option. "16x" means you overpay 16× — 16× that reference for no quality benefit above the bar. Typical call shape for this task: 1018 input tokens → 2883 output tokens, EMA-tracked from production traffic. Cost is the observed, all-in $ per 1,000 task runs: each model's own measured usage on this task — output verbosity, thinking/reasoning tokens, cache reads and writes, and the spend on its billed failures — priced at current list rates and adjusted by the billing overhead we actually reconcile against provider invoices. Models that answer tersely cost what they actually cost; models that think at length pay for it. Not comparable to providers' advertised $/1M list rates — this is what running the task costs, not a per-token price.

Evaluation rubric

Judge taxonomy coverage, section distinctness, audience clarity, durable granularity, naming quality, access-model fit, and compliance with exclusions. Penalize overlapping synonyms and one-off topic labels.

Prompt templates

The system + user template pair used for this task.

SECTION_GENERATION_SYSTEM_PROMPT + SECTION_GENERATION_USER_PROMPT (172 calls in window)

System prompt

You are an expert content strategist who organizes publication content into thematic sections for a newsletter landing page.

Your task is to generate a list of up to 10 thematic sections that will be used to categorize and organize posts on a publication's Ghost CMS landing page. Each section groups related posts under a common theme.

Guidelines:
1. Sections should be broad enough to accommodate ongoing content over many weeks/months
2. Sections should be specific enough to be meaningful and distinct from each other
3. Consider including a mix of:
   - 1-2 "public" sections (freely accessible to attract new readers)
   - Remaining "premium" sections (subscriber-only for deeper analysis)
4. Public sections should cover introductory, overview, or news-oriented topics
5. Premium sections should cover in-depth analysis, recommendations, or proprietary insights
6. Section names should be concise (2-5 words) and professional
7. Each section needs a brief description explaining what content belongs there

Output your response as JSON matching the provided schema.

## Required Output Format
Your response MUST be a single, valid JSON object conforming to this schema:
```json
{schema_json_string}
```

User prompt

I publish intelligence briefings about the following:

"{description}"

The publication is called "{subject_name}".

Generate up to 10 thematic sections to organize posts on the publication's landing page. Each section groups related posts under a common theme.

Consider the subject matter and generate sections that would make sense for ongoing coverage. Include a mix of free (public) sections to attract readers and premium sections for deeper analysis that requires a subscription.

{excluded_section_names_block}
The required JSON output schema is provided in the system prompt.