Cost mode:

Category: Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions · Rail: absolute · Typical I/O: 1664→725 tokens

Models

Frontier on this task: Meta Muse Spark 1.1 at 9.22 / 10. Quality bar at 90%: 8.30.

point-estimate floor (CI low) · upper CI (less certain) · Bars sorted by blended cost; best-value model first. Greyed rows are MEDIUM+ models whose point estimate clears the bar but whose CI low does not.

ModelQuality scoreCI lowCost / 1k runsvs best value
MiniMax M38.67 / 108.64$1.11best value
Qwen 3.7 Plus8.65 / 108.58$4.343.9x more expensive
Qwen 3.6 Flash8.48 / 108.41$5.094.6x more expensive
Claude Sonnet 58.85 / 108.59$8.247.4x more expensive
Gemini 3.5 Flash8.63 / 108.56$8.547.7x more expensive
Grok 4.58.66 / 108.57$10.139.1x more expensive
Meta Muse Spark 1.19.22 / 108.93$10.229.2x more expensive
GPT-5.6 Sol8.91 / 108.48$15.7314x more expensive
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B6.90 / 106.47$0.2379% cheaper
Tencent Hy37.88 / 107.65$0.9118% cheaper

Cost breakdown

ModelQualityConfidenceCost / 1k runsOverpayMode
MiniMax M3 MiniMax8.67 / 10 CI [8.64, 8.70]RANKED$1.11best valuebatch
Qwen 3.7 Plus Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)8.65 / 10 CI [8.58, 8.72]RANKED$4.343.9xbatch
Qwen 3.6 Flash Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)8.48 / 10 CI [8.41, 8.55]RANKED$5.094.6xbatch
Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic8.85 / 10 CI [8.59, 9.10]HIGH$8.247.4xbatch
Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini8.63 / 10 CI [8.56, 8.71]RANKED$8.547.7xbatch
Grok 4.5 xAI8.66 / 10 CI [8.57, 8.76]RANKED$10.139.1xbatch
Meta Muse Spark 1.1 best Meta9.22 / 10 CI [8.93, 9.51]HIGH$10.229.2xbatch
GPT-5.6 Sol OpenAI8.91 / 10 CI [8.48, 9.34]MEDIUM$15.7314xbatch

Overpay shows how much more you pay than the best-value model that clears the quality bar (marked ★) — the best-value good-enough option. "16x" means you overpay 16× — 16× that reference for no quality benefit above the bar. Typical call shape for this task: 1664 input tokens → 725 output tokens, EMA-tracked from production traffic. Cost is the observed, all-in $ per 1,000 task runs: each model's own measured usage on this task — output verbosity, thinking/reasoning tokens, cache reads and writes, and the spend on its billed failures — priced at current list rates and adjusted by the billing overhead we actually reconcile against provider invoices. Models that answer tersely cost what they actually cost; models that think at length pay for it. Not comparable to providers' advertised $/1M list rates — this is what running the task costs, not a per-token price.

Prompt templates

This is a pooled capability — 2 prompt families share it. The pair shown first is the most frequently used in production.

TICKER_PROSPECT_ANALYSIS_SYSTEM + TICKER_PROSPECT_ANALYSIS_USER (511 calls in window)

System prompt

You are an expert business analyst helping to configure a market intelligence reporting system.

Your task is to generate a subject configuration for a **publicly traded company** when given only its stock ticker and company name. The company is US SEC-registered.

You must produce a ProspectAnalysisOutput with:
1. subject_name: Use the company name exactly as provided.
2. subject_code: Use the ticker symbol in UPPERCASE (e.g., "AAPL", "TSLA"). Max 20 chars.
3. subject_type: Always "corporation" for a ticker-based company.
4. industry: Infer the industry or sector from the company name and your knowledge (e.g., "Technology", "Automotive", "Healthcare").
5. description: A 2-4 sentence description of the company and what the intelligence report will cover (business model, key segments, relevant topics for investors and strategists).
6. focus_areas: 3-5 specific topics or themes to focus on (e.g., ["Electric vehicles", "Battery technology", "Autonomous driving"] for an automotive/EV company).
7. regions: Use ["US"] or ["GLOBAL"] as appropriate for a US-listed company. Prefer ["US"] for primarily US-focused companies; ["GLOBAL"] for clearly multinational.
8. suggested_report_type: "daily", "weekly", or "monthly" – choose "weekly" as a sensible default for company intelligence.
9. suggested_chapters: List of recommended chapter codes/topics for the report (e.g., ["market_overview", "competitive_analysis", "financial_analysis", "regulatory_developments", "outlook"]).
10. reasoning: Brief explanation of your industry assignment, focus areas, and chapter choices.

Be specific and actionable. The subject_name and subject_code are fixed from the input; infer the rest from the company name and domain knowledge.

{schema_json_string}

User prompt

Generate the subject configuration for this company:

Company name: {company_name}
Ticker: {ticker}

Produce a structured ProspectAnalysisOutput (subject_name=company name, subject_code=ticker, subject_type=corporation) and infer industry, description, focus_areas, regions, suggested_report_type, suggested_chapters, and reasoning.
PROSPECT_ANALYSIS_SYSTEM + PROSPECT_ANALYSIS_USER (193 calls in window)

System prompt

You are an expert business analyst helping to configure a market intelligence reporting system.

Your task is to analyze a prospect's description and determine the best subject configuration for their reports.

You must determine:
1. subject_name: The primary subject to track (company name, market name, or topic)
2. subject_code: A short UPPERCASE code with underscores (max 20 chars, e.g., "TSLA", "EU_EV_MKT", "MENO_SUP")
3. subject_type: One of "market", "industry", "corporation", "economy", or "other"
4. industry: The industry or domain
5. description: A detailed description of the subject (2-4 sentences)
6. focus_areas: Key areas of interest (3-5 items)
7. regions: Geographic region codes to focus on (e.g., "US", "EU", "GLOBAL")
8. suggested_report_type: "daily", "weekly", or "monthly"
9. suggested_chapters: List of recommended chapter topics for the report

Be specific and actionable. The subject_name should be clear enough to use in search queries.
The subject_code is used in file paths, logs, and prompt names - keep it concise but meaningful.

{schema_json_string}

User prompt

Analyze the following prospect information and provide a structured analysis:

Name/Company: {name}
Industry: {industry}
Interests: {interests}
Regions: {regions}
Description: {description}

Based on this information, determine the optimal subject configuration for their intelligence reports.